
Reviews
Part of Ecommerce platforms: operational checks before choosing
Ecommerce platforms selection checklist: independent UK evidence gates
An ecommerce platforms selection checklist for England: independent gates for selling, payments, data, access, recovery and exit.
Use this ecommerce platforms selection checklist after defining one England merchant operation. Keep each mandatory gate independent. An attractive feature, discount or high weighted score cannot compensate for a failed consumer, product-safety, payment, privacy, accessibility or security requirement.
The accountable buyer must fill in every blank threshold before requesting proposals. Compare each candidate, including the current/manual route, against the same evidence date and synthetic test pack.
What to take away
- Each mandatory gate stands alone, so a discount or high score cannot excuse a failed requirement.
- Fill in every blank threshold before requesting proposals and compare all candidates on the same evidence date.
- Mark each gate pass, fail or hold with cited evidence, and remove any candidate after a mandatory fail.
- Reopen supplier and official pages on decision day, and let each specialist sign only their own subject.
Merchant and seller record
- Exact legal seller, trading name, address, customer geography and goods are approved.
- The proposed platform, plan or core version, payment service, host, apps and implementation supplier are named.
- Seller and supplier contracts identify parties, term, changes, liability, support, termination and surviving duties.
GOV.UK's online-selling guidance provides general information and ordering prompts. A qualified consumer and commercial lawyer must assess the actual journey and contract.
Merchant and seller record
- Legal seller, trading name, address approved
- Customer geography and goods approved
- Platform, plan, version, payment service named
- Host, apps and implementation supplier named
- Contracts identify parties, term, liability, termination
Catalogue, customer journey and products
- Every catalogue claim has an owner, source, date, rights record and correction route.
- Total-price, delivery, order correction, acceptance, confirmation, cancellation, return and refund states have observable evidence.
- Stock conflicts and duplicate orders have defined handling.
- A product can be traced, blocked, corrected and withdrawn across open orders and customer communications.
The OPSS product-safety page explains UK business roles, traceability and corrective action, with Great Britain and Northern Ireland distinctions. It does not approve any platform configuration. The chosen platform must also be able to meet the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 for the journeys it supports.
Payments, records and tax
- Payment authorisation, capture, settlement, refund, dispute and provider-fee events reconcile separately for whichever of Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, Worldpay, Klarna, GoCardless or a direct card acquirer is proposed.
- Card data flow, PCI DSS scope and strong customer authentication (SCA) under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 are evidenced for the configured build, with the self-assessment questionnaire that applies (SAQ A, SAQ A-EP or SAQ D) named and the party that completes it identified.
- Chargebacks follow the card scheme rules and each provider's own dispute process.
- No party receives money for another seller without an FCA perimeter decision from a qualified lawyer.
- The accountant owns ledger mapping; the tax adviser owns VAT treatment and evidence retention, including the registration threshold that applies to the merchant's turnover.
- Registration and filing are checked before launchICO registration and the data protection fee tier that applies to the business, and VAT registration with HMRC where the merchant's turnover requires it.
- Recorded before proposalsreconciliation tolerance, investigation owner and stop condition.
Use the FCA's payment-services perimeter prompt and the Payment Services Regulations 2017 for the actual money flow. Do not treat a platform payment label as permission or tax advice. Take the VAT registration threshold from GOV.UK and the data protection fee tiers from the ICO, not from a proposal.
Privacy, PECR and access
- Controllers, processors, purposes, lawful bases, data fields, recipients, retention and deletion are documented.
- Cookies, pixels and other device access are mapped by purpose and current rule.
- Direct-marketing permission and suppression remain separate from order-service messages.
- Least-privilege roles, single sign-on (for example Okta or Microsoft Entra ID), joiner and leaver steps, privileged-event logs and access reviews are tested.
The UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (PECR) are the instruments that govern this boundary. The ICO's guidance on cookies and similar technologies sets out the storage and access rules for device-level data. Qualified privacy review remains required.
Accessibility, security and service
- Disabled users and an accessibility specialist test catalogue, basket, checkout, authentication, errors and support in the configured build against WCAG 2.2 level AA and EN 301 549.
- Security evidence matches the contracting entity, service boundary, locations and dates, and is tested against a named scheme: Cyber Essentials, ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2.
- Incident detection, containment, communication, clean recovery and retrospective ownership are rehearsed.
- Recorded before proposalssupport measure event, population, clock start and stop, exclusions and threshold.
The NCSC's supplier-assurance questions cover security governance, cloud dependencies, data, incidents and independent assurance. Supplier answers still need evidence and buyer evaluation, and the Equality Act 2010 is the accessibility duty that WCAG 2.2 level AA testing evidences.
Portability, continuity and exit
- Catalogue, images, customers, orders, payments, refunds, tax evidence, permissions and audit events have field-level export maps as CSV files and documented API schemas.
- Contract and law define what must be retained; deletion covers supplier and sub-processor copies where applicable.
- A fresh environment restores the agreed records and preserves relationships, identifiers, encodings and timestamps.
- Supplier outage, price or term change, integration failure and closure have owners and decision triggers.
- Recorded before proposalsmaximum tolerated data loss, recovery time threshold and restart authority.
Platform capability and total-cost comparison
- Each named candidateShopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, Adobe Commerce, Wix and Squarespace — is recorded on the same evidence date against the capabilities the gates above depend on, not against marketing pages.
- Which of Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, Worldpay, Klarna, GoCardless or a direct acquirer each candidate supports, and who completes the PCI DSS self-assessment questionnaire in that configuration.
- VAT and tax handling for UK and cross-border sales, invoicing, reporting and evidence retention.
- Multi-channel selling, marketplace and app-ecosystem integrations, and how each one affects the data gates above.
- Migration and exit toolingfield-level CSV exports, documented API schemas, URL redirects, and transfer of customer and order history.
- Total cost of ownership is evidenced in writing by each supplier for the same basket of requirements: subscription or licence, transaction and payment fees, app and theme costs, implementation, support and exit costs. Ask each supplier for the figures rather than accepting a range.
Record the decision
Mark each gate PASS, FAIL or HOLD and cite its evidence. Leave weights blank unless the accountable buyer approves them. Remove a candidate after any mandatory FAIL. HOLD remains appropriate when a contract, configuration, specialist opinion or recovery test is missing.
Reopen supplier and official pages on decision day. The procurement reviewer signs the comparison method; each specialist signs only their own subject. Selection is justified only for the stated merchant case and does not promise compliance, availability or commercial results.
Before you act
- Define one England merchant operation before starting the comparison.
- Fill in every blank threshold before requesting proposals.
- Compare each candidate against the same synthetic test pack.
- Mark each gate pass, fail or hold and cite evidence.
- Remove a candidate after any mandatory fail.
- Reopen supplier and official pages on decision day.
Common questions
What should the accountable buyer do before requesting proposals?
The accountable buyer must fill in every blank threshold before requesting proposals. Each candidate, including the current or manual route, is then compared against the same evidence date and synthetic test pack. Weights stay blank unless the accountable buyer approves them.
When should a candidate be removed from the comparison?
Remove a candidate after any mandatory fail, because an attractive feature, discount or high weighted score cannot compensate for a failed consumer, product-safety, payment, privacy, accessibility or security requirement. A hold remains appropriate when a contract, configuration, specialist opinion or recovery test is missing.
Who signs off the comparison method and specialist subjects?
The procurement reviewer signs the comparison method, while each specialist signs only their own subject. Selection is justified only for the stated merchant case and does not promise compliance, availability or commercial results. A qualified consumer and commercial lawyer must assess the actual journey and contract.



